India of 2010 is not the India of 1947.
In India, which has a population of over 1.2 billion today, does it have sufficient grannery to feed the mouths? Has our Below Poverty Line estimate suffices the requirement of food for the downtrodden. The much proclaimed Food Guarantee Bill, will it create a harvest of mouthful for these have-nots? India is looking forward to a thrillion economy; in these, how much these dastard and laggard people, earn to lead a hand-to-mouth livelihood. Has Malthusian theory come true in India?
When the First Five Year Plan gave supremacy of Agriculture, and the Green Revolution that followed, today’s plan (XI Five Year Plan) has hopes of achieving 4% growth even though the Plan delivered a flat 0.20% during the mid-term analysis of the XI Plan. The Plan, gives scant outlay to agriculture, does not evolve Schemes to better productivity in agri-based products, and in the least pretexts, and look as an instant solution to Imports. It even imported Public Loan 480 from America, the rice not fit enough even for rats! The Rice, and wheat stored in the Food Corporation of India mainly meant for distribution to the BPL families, is fodder for rats. Food Security Bill with Crores of Rupees of public money can be advantageous only if the food reached the poor, downtrodden. In India, for agriculture subsidy, kerosene oil subsidy (for lighting, cooking), fertiliserz, etc the middle-men knocked off a chunk of money. The Plan architect Montek Singh Aluwaliah, and the agriculture expert Dr Swaminathan are polls apart in perceiving what is best for agriculture. Our Economists theorize but often theory in the alter of reality never meet; we have massive outlay for Agriculture, that is funds spent in the name of agriculture. Hydro electric projects drowned the fertile lands, and doused the agricultural yield. Conversion of agricultural land for development, a mantra of the Globalization concept, has devastated agricultural development and growth. In Kerala, where Coconut was a plantation has become a home stud crop thanks to Kerala Land Reforms.
First area of concern is Agricultural Credit. Credit flow has risen sharply, Dr B K Chaturvedi, Dy Governor will explain eloquently. The Credit was channelised through RRBs, commercial Banks in rural areas. Commercial banks gave loans to SIDBI and other institutions that supported agriculture. Agricultural loans were characterized as priority sector loans. In the last decade or so, loans were given to Corporates, tractor manufacturers, fertilizer companies, advances worth many Crores, but they were shown as priority sector advances to agriculture. A disturbing future of the agriculture Credit is astronamal growth of agricultural finance that is urban in nature. The share of agricultural Credit supplied by urban and metropolitan bank branches in India increased from 16.3% to 30.7%. . One third of the agricultural Credit was given by metropolitan and urban banks while the share of the rural, semi-urban, RRB got reduced to less than 50%. One question is pertinent- Corporate/agricultural firms get Credit over Rs 1 cr in aggregate per borrower, but shown in Bank books as agriculture Credit (2007 onwards). Is it not an institutional make-up in the loan portfolio to show that Credit for agricultural is growing. Fertilizer subsidy, one would like to ask the question. How much have fertilizer companies grown their declared profits, and what catalytic role they played in improving agricultural productivity? In the state of Maharashtra alone, rural branches provided 25.7% credit towards agriculture while metropolitan bank branches gave a credit for agricultural sector @ 42.6% of the total agricultural credit in Maharashtra in 2008. The actual farmer in the villages, whose financial needs are sparse, would benefit the least from the present Agricultural Credit Policy which are pocked by Corporate, partnership firms having as allied enterprise, agriculture, etc. Reliable data is available to show that what is termed as agriculture Credit may have little to do with agriculture! Shocking!
The Second area of which government is least concerned is the irrigational source. Hon’ble Minister of Agriculture, Dy Chairman of Planning Commission will blame the rains for failure in Rabi crops or poor show of kharif crops. Poor monsoon, sluggish agriculture growth. No agriculturalist is concerned about average rainfall data but he looks for daily rainfall during the agricultural season for his survival. The Planners presuppose that the fluctuation of monsoon on a year-on-year basis is the problem of agricultural diminishing returns. It is not the total rainfall or levels in reservoirs that matter to majority. It is the rain on time. Dry crops might not require lot of Water or expensive irrigation facilities but timely rain. Drought related measures to temporarily assist may be useful but strategic and long term measures need to be taken. Here, our planners have failed lock, stock, and barrel. Irrigation infrastructure is deteriorating due to poor maintenance of irrigation systems. The overuse of Water is being covered by over pumping aquifers, but as they are falling by foot of ground water yield, this is limited resource. It is unscientific approach of the Planning Commission for the improper use of water, irrigation planning.
We suggest some steps: a. Agriculture, adaptation measures in rural sector should receive major institutional/financial support for evolving policies for implementation of specific programmes in the short- to- long term. (b) Measures to manage water resources on an annual cycle basis and it should be stored and distributed; some times long spell of rainfall above the normal, some times successive draught hamper the storage of water policy. The water storage level has to be decentralized to a sub basin level. Storing water on surface and underground in order to build storages for later years need to be planned. (c) Focusing on dry land agriculture and soil moisture. 75 million hectares are under food grain production in the dry land mode (d) Policy interventions: lack of saving the water or improving water productivity is actually leading to wastage. But not one rupee is in the XI Plan is allotted; (ii) incentives to use chemical fertilizers may actually induce soil degradation and put farmers of dry land farming in disadvantage(iii) Poor farmers, rural farmers do not require Rs 1 cr capital loan; the metropolitan banks need not support agriculture. Let it to be supported by NABARD (by forming micro finance companies run by honest NGOs), RRB, and Rural Banks. Stop writing off of loans, stop free power, and re-look at the clients who have agricultural loans.
Let Planning Commission answer. Let RBI do some introspection in respect of Credits to agricultural farmers? Let the Agriculture Minister look at the agriculture in its total prespective. Let the Controller and Audit General, look at Crores of Rupees of money not getting into the Agricultural arena? Let the opposition ask pertinent questions and do some honest homework. Let our newspapers and electronic media look at the agricultural issue in germane and file a faithful and accurate report. All these institutions are sleeping. Only when rats enter the FCI godowns and eat wheat, the matter comes to national attention?
No comments:
Post a Comment