Macroeconomic & Fiscal miscalculations

India is an emerging economy in the emerging economies slated to post immense growth rate by the 2150 AD as part of the BRIC. It may be jubilation or euphoria, but it is no better than PIGS (Portuguese, Ireland, Greece, and Spain) which are considered as Crisis economies. There is currently an economic view that throwing good money after bad is only going to make the matters worst. This holds well, some European economists feel about Greece which had seen no turnaround in its economy even though European Union has been helping the troubled Euro nation of Greece. Unless something miracle happens, European Union may see Greece exiting. So also, the after shocks of the indiscriminate fuel hike in India. Kingfisher is its first victim, even though it suffers from many diseases overtly. Should lifeline be given? Banks are mum, RBI is mum, and Government is mum. It took the Herculean effort in the Government to provide impetus to Air India or Indian airlines. Kingfisher has been declared as a “Non Performing Asset”. There was all-round skepticism about the appetite for raking more risks. Banks have refused to open the liquidity until they (banks) receive some dues. But, with more and more fights grounded, the account under operation under Garnishee Law- for Income Tax dept has attached the account; the survival of Kingfisher looks very unclear. Passenger Cars also have been affected by the petroleum product hike. This has affected the IIP output which was 5.7% in Oct 2011, 6.6% in November 2011 and 1.8% in December 2011. There has been a marked decline in the capital goods manufacturing though power sector with 8.3% growth and Services sector with 9.6%, with overall food inflation touching negative from the 16% almost six months ago, core and general inflation too, in the vicinity of 6.5%, making it clear that India is not out of the woods. The growth rate has been projected as 7%, but it is likely to be 6.8-6.9%. The foreign direct investment and foreign institutional investment has come down, and gross fixed capital formation as a proportion to GDP has come down by 4 percentage points to 29.3% from 32.9 %( 2007-8). Large scale liquidity injection by European Central Bank since Dec 2011 has lowered yields on the Government bonds. 20% of the foreign currency convertible bonds due for conversion are likely to default. Gold import has been a component which has increased the Current a/c deficit which was around 3.6% of the GDP in the first, second quarter of 2011-12. This import had to reduce merchandise imports. Primary food inflation saw acceleration of need for money wage rates, cash prices, behaviour of manufactured goods, cascading to increased subsidy bill, and higher government finances. Fiscal consolidation, which is a pillar of macroeconomic stability, budgeted at 4.6% may touch 6%. The uncertainty in the forex rates(if the exposure is unhedged), has made ECCBs which were a cheaper financing option has become costlier, making the benefit of the debt completely wiped off leaving the company on the verge of default in testing times. Come XII Plan (2012-17). The mandarins in the North and South Block in Delhi have predicted a growth of 9% in 2012-13on the conditionality that the grim world economic scenario improves. It is Monte Carlo method!

Government of Contradictions throw planning awry

Indian economy has withstood the torrential economic crisis of 2007-9. That is what the Government wants us to believe. Double dip growth cruve, we are at the fag end of the curve, and what remains is an inclined growth. It is raining cats and dogs, and our agricultural growth looks promising. In the end of the last fiscal, contrary to the Planning Commission’s expected growth of (-) 0.20% while, the agricultural growth posted (+) 0.20%. Quite often, planning commission’s growth figures are not only wrong but goes astray notwithstanding that they are only supposed to Plan, write the guidelines, question the achievable or nonachievables, after including it in the funding, unable to ear-mark actual funds due to funds volatility or shortage. Like sure sciences, economic planning is subject to rational or irrational human behaviour which can be contradictory to what could have been imagined. What are Plans? Mere estimates or one’s real assessment of growth, development in mathematical form.

The Union Finance Minister when he unveiled the budget, pictured a scenario of modest to good growth based on his premise that the world economy was growing, blooming, and zooming. However, in view of the carry over of the crisis-riddled economy, he had to impose certain taxes, increase certain surcharges, maintain the equilibrium in some areas, be considerate in some other areas, and be tight fisted in areas where lot of help has been given. The first step was when the prices of petroleum products were increased in March. The feeble voice of the Opposition, who became men of straw, did not have the vigour to shout. Hence kept quiet. Emboldened by this silence, again, on June 25, the Group of Minsiters (like the proverbial monkeys- see me not, hear me not, no speak) decided to increase the petroleum prices at the rate of Rs 3.50 per petrol, Rs 2.00 per diesel, Rs 3/- per kerosene and Rs 35 per LPG Cyclinder. Government’s argument was, though the oil companies showed profit in their balance sheets, it was factoring the subsidy given by government, which was causing a drain on the exchequer. Why not use it for some more productive exercises. And even after this added pricing, the inflation would enhance by less than 1%. Headline inflation was 10.16%, which government corrected as 11%, while food inflation touched 12.92% falling from 16%. No doubt, ONGC got a whopping Rs 5,400 Cr by way of bonanza because of this raise while Oil India’s additional income is expected to rise by Rs 800 Cr. In addition government got a share of central levies at the raised prices. The Railways would incur heavy losses while gas based power would have to incur an additional of Re 1/ unit (kWh).

The Fiscal deficit envisaged by the Finance Minister was 5.5% of GDP. He had budgeted an expenditure of Rs 11.09 lakh crore, while tax and non tax revenue was expected to yield Rs 6.82 lakh Cr. He had to resort to borrowing of Rs 3.81 lakh Crore. He was on a strong wicket, as his deficit pitched at 5.5%, while 2009-10 (6.8%) (revised 6.9%). The Finance Minister had proudly announced that the rolling targets for fiscal deficit was plugged at 4.8 %( 2011-12) & (2012-13). Finance Minister is in a tearing hurry to jump the fence.

The first casualty of the guillotine of the stimulus was the Technology Upgradation Fund of the Textiles Ministry which has been withheld temporarily. He may cut down DEPB, reduce DDB, and other fiscal stimulus offered to various segments of Exports which did exceptionally well in spite of several shortcomings.

Under the targeted Public Distribution System, only 57% of the 652.03 lakh BPL families (up from 596.23 lakh) are covered by it. The amount of subsidies for food, fertilizer and petroleum is expected to be Rs 64,929 Cr. Central Issue price (CPI) for Above Poverty Line will be 100% of the commercial FCI’s commercial cost, while 50% subsidy was provided for Below Poverty Line people. The difference between APL and BPL prices provide strong incentives for illegal diversions to the market. The Government had identified BPL families through select geographical targeting which they found unrealistic.

Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Dy Chairman, Plg Commission when questioned the rationale, replied that the Government is not supposed to subsidies the oil companies. Somebody has got to pay for it (cheaper kerosene and LPG)- either through general revenues or from jacking up petrol prices. Subsidies need to be utilized for building schools, education, hospital, etc. He candidly said that people building roads should build roads, while Planning Commission members provided guidelines, econometrics, and implementation strategy. But the implementation was by some other body. He concurred that the Planning Commission had targeted 7000 Kms of National Highways @ 20 kms per day. But funds have to be found for it. He said regarding building of Delhi Airport, the role of the Commission selecting the Operator.

Regarding the point that under Road Transport, Planning Commission had targeted 7000 Kms of national highways without allocating funds would mean, that the non availability of planned allocation would halt the project. There cannot be discussions on it. Secondly, the Planning Commission deputy chief should be aware that around Rs 70,000 Cr were pumped to the Government account by the Spectrum auction. The expected and anticipated bringing down of stimulus for sectors which had done well last year, would yield another Rs 50,000 Cr. Already the announcement of ‘base rate’ would help the Banks to mobilize more money and more income, which would be pro rata given back to the Government as dividend. If Indian Oil Corporation has been patronized through subsidies and if they had made profits to the extent of Rs 10,220 Cr in 2009-10, how much of it was granted to government by way of dividend. In Rs 10,220 Cr, what was the percentage of subsidy that the Government shelled out? Dr B K Chaturvedi Committee appointed by the Plg Commission has clearly pointed out that subsidy for BPL families in 100% electrified villages found way to black market, and 26% of the total kerosene was used to adulterate diesel, what action did the Planning Commission or Government of India do?

Government had serious concern for Indian labour. If they had, why EPF interest is still retained at 8.5%. Why don't you make it 10%.

If the Plg Commission was so concerned for money, why is Indian Government importing Crude Palm oil at ‘nil’ Customs duties and edible palm oil at 7.5% which account for a loss of income to the tune of Rs 24,000 Cr. Further 3 lakh tones of Palmoil is distributed through PDS by subsidizing 1 litre of Palm oil by Rs 15/- which amounts to around Rs 4000 Cr. Planning Commission targets a growth rate, then mid-course changes it, and at the end of the year alters it, and what is achieved is a different percentage? How does Planning Commission Chairman endorse this? Accountability rests with the Commission. It cannot absolve/abdicate itself of the responsibility.

Asia has arrived

Will the 21st century usher in Asian Revolution, just as the 15th Century belonged to the golden age of the Elizabethan era, Industrial Revolution, 17th century to American Revolution and French Revolution and 19th century to the Russian Revolution? The 21 st century Revolution however, will afford a pan loose-knit regional economic integration so that the logistics of an increasingly China-India centric supply chain could bring economy back to rails in Asia.
Asia has proven comparatively resilient against the current downturn, but hurdles still lie ahead. In order to maintain robust growth rates in the face of weak U.S. demand, the region’s dynamic economies must stoke domestic consumption and embrace environmentally sustainable development policies
Asia has arrived. The prospects for increased integration and cooperation between the region’s economies have, indeed, brightened. .
Asia of the past 30 years has done an incredibly well. China and India have driven their economies through export led growth. The Services sector in India has done innumerably well, and have exports worth $ 50 billion plus. But this model is close to having outlived its usefulness. The future of Asia will be more consumer-led, will have a growth dynamic that places greater emphasis on the quality of the growth experience, especially in terms of environmental protection and pollution control.
· Nearly 75% of the world’s economic activity now takes place outside the U.S. Worldwide investments are expected to double to more than $300 trillion in the coming years – with over $150 trillion going to new global markets.
· The steady, growing transfer of wealth and power from industrialized nations to developing regions is happening faster than anyone could have imagined.
Until recently, the global multinationals have seen developing Asia as an off shore production platform, to get goods at a cheaper price because of low labour costs. That concentrated on exports. The other option, to tap the regional consumers whose purchasing power and rising expectations were growing were ignored This is the time, for the multinationals to tap the domestic market, which is easily in their palms to exploit.
The external demands that underpin the export model are chaotic. Even though production size is growing, Asia has been developing while recession fed Europe and American economy which is in deep crisis cannot patronize Asian goods. Even if they want, pricing will be awful. Credit would extend to 6 months to 1 year. Instead of looking externally, the businesses in Asia have to look inward to reap the benefit for the country’s consumers who would average 3.8 billion who have money to buy. Economic development, therefore, depends upon the need to aggressively market its products internally rather than externally. There is no choice.
China’s GDP grew 10.4% to 13.06 trillion Yuan ($ 1.9 trillion) in the first half of the last fiscal. China has been able to quadruple its GDP since 1978. In 2002, with its 1.28 billion people but a GDP of just $ 4600 per capita, China stood as the Second largest economy in the world after United States (measured on a purchasing power parity basis). China also overtook South Africa as world’s largest gold producer in 2008, when its output increased from 270.5 tonne to 300 tonne. China exports to United States dipped by 20.5% to US$957.36 billion. Trade value between China and the country’s three major trade partners, the EU, the U.S. and Japan, was US$292.42 billion, US$239.36 billion, and US$182.34 billion during the first ten months of 2009, which averaged a drop in growth of 18.7%, 14.9% and 19.3%.
India has a well built micro scenario, but a weak macro scenario. The Micro scenario is very positive in India. A large population working in world class competitive companies, well educated, English speaking, competent and hard working talented workforce; highly competent MBA Institutes, stable financial institutions, high class engineering and medical institutions. When we come to the macro platform, India has instable savings, limited FDI, low Diaspora NRI investment, horrible infrastructure, high cost runs as project planning often goes awry in view of plethora of inhibitions at the decision making levels.
Indian exports have been blossoming, from $ 43 billion to US $ 178 billion, nearly three fold, FDI has also grown even though it is no where near to China, and remittances from Indian workers abroad contribute to around 20% of the Foreign Exchange Reserves which is around $ 280 billion.
And the most important layer of India’s ditherness is in its Politics. Between 2004-9, the Government wrote a Common Minimum programme to get the support of the Communists. Reform had to remain very much within the realms of the reformed Congress. In the election held in 2009, Congress has been voted back to power on the plane of better governance and performance. But little of the commitment they gave during election rhetoric is seen translated into action. Expect for a few and far between, the Government continues to blame the inept rains for the diminishing production of food grains leading to inflation in foodstuffs, edible oil, sugar, cerals, wheat etc. The world economy is blamed for the unimpressive show by the dithering exports. There is a huge liquidity in the system yet, the movement of circulation of currency is rather muffled.
Everybody looks to china as the Asian giant. There is no stop over. But India could be the real sleeper in Asia in a couple of years. India should not become excessively export dependent. India is also trying to increase and enhance its trade with China. It is both good and bad. Our over dependence with America should also stop. We should not be constrained by demography, as some of the States are vocal in getting many concessions over other states.
Indian Government has wisely signed a FTA with ASEAN Countries. This would spur more bi-lateral and multilateral trade between India and ASEAN. It is also true that Pakistan instead of wasting their limited resources, should venture into trade so that there will be economic boom which would provide steep employment resulting in their youngsters looking up for jobs instead getting attracted to terrorist activity. Sri Lanka is in the growth plane, after the devastating war which took all its efforts. A new global order with Asia as central point will emerge.