On the one hand there is a clamour against price rise. On the other are various restrictions on imports. This way, prices will remain high and we will continue to see more and more tinkering with interest rates. The problem is that high interest rates raise the cost of capital and, therefore, discourage investment. When the rate of growth in investment reduces, growth suffers. Lower rates of growth are clearly unacceptable, so are high prices. But with high tariffs and high/vague protectionism, we will not be able to help neither the slowdown in growth nor increase in domestic prices.
Look at the recent hike on June 25, 2010 in Petroleum prices. The increase was (+) Rs 3.50 for petrol, (+) Rs 2/- for diesel, Rs 3/- more for kerosene, and (+) Rs 35/- per LPG Cylinder. The increase is across the board. According to Government, subsidizing Petrol companies which show book profits on sales price of petrol + Government subsidies which causes 5 digit profits cannot be afforded by the nation. The subsidy burden is transferred to the people, whom the Government feels, have paying capacity so that vulnerable sections who do not have paying capacity can be helped through specialized subsidy schemes. India is after all a benign socialist democracy. Economic pundits and intellectual economists who have been advising the Government have averred that the hike in petroleum products will have an impact less than 1% on headline inflation which is hovering around 10.16% making it rise to 11%. The disparity between the Wholesale Price Index and Consumer price Index which was very high has been narrowed down, and the food inflation has been brought down to 12.92% from 16%. To further counter check inflation, RBI has increased the repo and reverse repo rates which today stand at 5.5% and 4% respectively.
The Finance Minister’s cautious budget had placed fiscal deficit at 5.5% of the GDP. His expenditure was estimated at Rs 11.09 lakh Crore, while tax and non tax revenue were expected to yield the state Rs 6.82 lakh Crore. Fiscal deficit for 2009-10 was 6.9%. Rolling targets for fiscal deficit for 2011-12 and 2012-13 has been expected to come down to 4.8%. Very commendable progressive budget compared to the deficit finance budget of earlier years. Forget, it was the Congress that ruled the country and the Finance minister was from one of its ranks.
Who said that the Public Distribution System is not in order? The 57% of the targeted 652.03 lakh Below Poverty Line people are covered for which an outlay of Rs 64,929 Cr was ear-marked. The Government has fixed Central Issue Prices (CIP) for APL at the purchase price of FCI, so that BPL could be supplied at 50%of FCI’s economic cost. But with all this spending the incidence of poverty should have come down. But it has gone up. Government wants to preserve money for the Food Security Programme to obliterate poverty by providing one square meal a day. Already 100 days compulsory employment programme has emancipated the capacity of many, claims Government. There are many who want to remain ‘voluntarily’ unemployed. These people are in the ‘you can take horse to water but cannot make it drink’. According to the study conducted by Dr B K Chaturvedi Committee, it was found that 39% of PDS was diverted and 18% reached the hands of those who used it for adulterating petrol. The Committee also observed that rural use of kerosene for lighting has come down to 40% to 51%, and hardly 1% is used by BPL families for cooking purposes. A shock assessment was that 24% of rural consumption going to states for lighting where there is 100% electrification. Often kerosene oil reaches the hands of the unintended. The difference between APL and BPL prices provide strong incentives for illegal diversions to the market. The number of BPL families varies according to the State list, Planning Commission figures, NCAER, etc. A new study-the multidimensional poverty index(MPI)- by Oxford Poverty and Human Development-UNDP initiative revels that there are 421 million MPI poor spread across Bihar, Chittisgarh, Jharkhand, MP, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal(in India) compared to 410 million in the 26 poorest African countries put together. The MPI assesses poverty on the deprevations on a host of key factors. How can BPL inspite of heavy subsidizing multiply? Is Malthusian theory at work?
The prices of vegetables and other food items have been going up steadily. The manufacturing growth has been accelerating. Share market is steadily galloping. However, there is a short term shift is noticed from equity and reality markets to risk free, capital guaranteed deposits in India. This is the reason, that despite the purchasing power among the middle class, white collared, ethnic population, etc, invest in Fixed Deposits though the returns are marginal having eroded due to government’s wild fetched theory of low interest regime. When interest is lower than inflation, it is not a healthy sign, forgot the Economics studied rulers and advisors in the Government.
Surpringly for Government, Spectrum auction brought Rs 70,000 Cr to its coffers. Petroleum hike reduced the subsidy burden on the Government. Base rate will enable the Banks to squeeze the common man, advantage multinationals, so that more paper interest will accrue, and the balance sheet will be green. Even though all the bank top executives shook their head together when an internal committee of RBI had recommended replacement of erstwhile BPLR system with base rate regime. Now Bankers started having second thoughts. If the borrower refused to accept the ‘base rate’, there would be two set of interest bearing loan accounts- one with the old rate, and one with the base rate. The bankers have requested RBI to add a sunset clause to its earlier notification asking banks to benchmark lending rates on the base rate effective from 1 July 2010. It was announced that the RBI will give the Banks an extension of a year to follow the base rate. Should not the notification anticipate legal problems, before the announcement? Government bodies become wise after the event. That is what Harshad Mehta taught the Government. Limping export sector is grouping in the dark, awaiting Domiciles Sword at any time. Half of the Stimulus outlay will be removed says grapevine from Delhi. That would add to available surplus. Finance Minister has already announced disinvestment to the tune of Rs 24,000 Cr. Another shedding of 2.5% in the nationalized Banks, Insurance Companies and navaratnas would easily fetch him Rs 25,000 Cr. With all these monies on his chest, the Finance Minister is sitting on a chest of money. If P Chidambaram can write off Rs 70,000 Cr as farm loan waiver, why can’t his successor do much more? Provide Food Stability to the extent of Rs 1, 00,000 Cr?
Has the Finance Minister heard of Nils Gilman, who authored the ‘Deviant Globalization theory?’ In our economy, there are illegal unrecorded transactions like flow of unaccounted money, black money transactions in financial, real estate, energy, drugs, organs, hawala transactions, which can torpedo meticulous planning in the controlled economy. Swiss Bank accounts? Every body promises to bring the money, but nobody has. We need to vigilantly and vigorously pursue the agenda that we have written. Finance Minister should be slow when undertaking the exercise of taxation which he thinks is the only way to bring sunshine to India’s fragile economy, a philosophy exploded by Dr Montek Singh Aluwahlia at the Devil’s Advocate programme.
No comments:
Post a Comment