Indian petroleum companies are shedding crocodile tears for no apparent reason.
Myth: 1] Indian oil Corporation has gone on record and stated that it incurred a loss of Rs 3,388.89 Cr in the first quarter of current fiscal as against a nett profit of Rs 3,682.83 Cr recorded in the first quarter of last year.
2] The Company made a net profit of Rs 10,000 Cr in 2009-10 and the Dy Chairman, Plg Commission states that this is inclusive of the 50% subsidies provided by the Government to the tune of Rs 20,000 Cr during 2009-10.
3] It is a fact that Government revised the prices of petroleum products by Rs 3/- in the last quarter of 2009-10, the benefit of which would have cascaded to 2010-11, and in the second instance, another adhoc increase, just a month ago, raising the price of petrol by Rs 3.50/litre, diesel by Rs 2.00, LPG Cylinder by Rs 35/-, Rs 3/per litre for kerosene. Kerosene is mostly used by the Below the Poverty Line families.
4] Oil companies contend that they incur $ 3 barrel on processing of every barrel of Crude oil. This year (April-June, 2010), they state that their gross refining margin (GRM) was Rs 7.36 per barrel.
5] The oil Companies admit that ‘refining margins were low due to inventory losses on oil as oil prices had come down compared to the closing stock(April 1).
While oil companies put forward such arguments to prove the acute under pricing in the import of crude, and the under recovery caused by the sale of oil, which is only 50% subsidized by the Government, they argue for increased prices from the consumer. Simple Law of demand and Supply pricing.
Reality: 1] One should go into the mathematical calculations of the purchase of Crude oil, quantity of Crude oil purchased, what is the demand: supply position of Petroleum products in India, how is the pricing done in the existing circumstances, and when there has been no appreciable increase in the petroleum prices in the international market, why are the Petroleum Companies in India are on a song, and hungry for more revenue? Now, how could the profit of Rs 3,682.82 Cr during the last first fiscal, turn into a loss, assuming that Government did not part with Rs 1,694.45 Cr as 50% of its share in the loss. This is only a notional adjustment in the balance sheet. Loss is a loss, whether it is subsidized by people or Government.
Dr B K Chaturvedi Committee went into the issue of usage of Kerosene oil in the Country. His findings have been documented. The study revealed that the use of kerosene has come down from 40% to 51% used earlier, only 1% is used for cooking purposes; out of 39% PDS Kerosene, 18% finds a way to the black market to adulterate diesel, 24% of rural consumption used for lighting is in villages where there is 100% electrification. Only 40% of the kerosene finds use. The rest is not used. Government’s subsidy for kerosene is Rs 17.92/a litre. What happens to the kerosene which is said to be distributed? The distribution is only in paper. Why can’t the Planning Commission do a detailed study to unearth the truth?
2] The truth is Petroleum companies’ profits are notched. They are virtual profits. How can any body say that factoring government subsidies, Companies make profit? These are monopoly Companies who are answerable to nobody.
3] During the year, the Government revised the petroleum prices at least on two occasions. Yet, why should there be a steep loss. Is it operational efficiency? Seepage? Misue?
4) How come such a vast change in refining? Has the government gone into the pricing of refining? In the first instance, they use the term cost of processing of Crude oil, and in the second case, they say gross refining margin. What does these two mean? Let the Economists of North bloc ponder over this aspect
5) The oil inventory showed it held excess stock. This stock had a price that was higher than the prevailing price as on 1 April 2010. The Oil Companies also admit that negatives on account of exchange losses due to Rupee depreciation and higher provisioning of bonds(the Government bonds that was given in lieu of 50% of the under recoveries). If they contend that these anomalies must be factored into the price of petroleum products, it is not fair and decent price determination.
.
Due to dollar depreciation, the invoice value of crude import should have come down, as the prices are paid in dollars. There is a comfortable cushion in this. In India, you are selling in Rupees. You don’t link the price to the Dollar. Hence twin advantage. Please use the same matrix for comparison.
The Company argues that the nett revenue lost by IOC was Rs 11,013.58 Cr. It was compensated Rs 3,671.26 Cr from upstream firms like Oil & Gas Corporation, GAIL and Oil India. Consequent to non revision of retail selling price in line with the international prices, net under realization was Rs 7,341.59 Cr. The usual practice was that the Government reimbursed Rs 20,000 Cr for under recoveries of IOC, BP, and HP during 2010-11.
The oil Companies agree that the net sales during 2010-11 went up by 23% to Rs 71,257 Cr. IOC alone had 17.254 million tones of petroleum products against 16.703 million tones duing the corresponding period (April-June 2009) while it exported 1.058 million Tonnes. The Refineries refined 13.278 million tones of Crude oil against 12.466 million tones a year ago during March-June of 2010 and 2009. The refineries are said to have clamped Rs 6.50 per litre as charges.
The oil Companies do not do any homework and incapable of working an alternate strategy. One aspect that Planning Commission should look into the capacity of motor cars being sold in India during a year, and whether the present infrastructure has capacity to withstand them. Secondly, if the demand for petroleum products could be brought down through planning, it will have a cascading effect on the supply and pricing. Merely to boost the manufacturing output, if uneven growth in manufacture of motor cars is made, the infrastructure would break down. It is good to draw a road map to build 7,000 km of highway Roads. But the wear and tear, its optimum capacity and longevity are factors that needed to be factored in. It can’t be utopian. Banks find it easy to provide vehicle loan as the motorcar is a tangible asset. But whatever incremental growth that is achieved should be practical and long withstanding otherwise, it will become Robinson Crusoe paradox situation.
Myth: 1] Indian oil Corporation has gone on record and stated that it incurred a loss of Rs 3,388.89 Cr in the first quarter of current fiscal as against a nett profit of Rs 3,682.83 Cr recorded in the first quarter of last year.
2] The Company made a net profit of Rs 10,000 Cr in 2009-10 and the Dy Chairman, Plg Commission states that this is inclusive of the 50% subsidies provided by the Government to the tune of Rs 20,000 Cr during 2009-10.
3] It is a fact that Government revised the prices of petroleum products by Rs 3/- in the last quarter of 2009-10, the benefit of which would have cascaded to 2010-11, and in the second instance, another adhoc increase, just a month ago, raising the price of petrol by Rs 3.50/litre, diesel by Rs 2.00, LPG Cylinder by Rs 35/-, Rs 3/per litre for kerosene. Kerosene is mostly used by the Below the Poverty Line families.
4] Oil companies contend that they incur $ 3 barrel on processing of every barrel of Crude oil. This year (April-June, 2010), they state that their gross refining margin (GRM) was Rs 7.36 per barrel.
5] The oil Companies admit that ‘refining margins were low due to inventory losses on oil as oil prices had come down compared to the closing stock(April 1).
While oil companies put forward such arguments to prove the acute under pricing in the import of crude, and the under recovery caused by the sale of oil, which is only 50% subsidized by the Government, they argue for increased prices from the consumer. Simple Law of demand and Supply pricing.
Reality: 1] One should go into the mathematical calculations of the purchase of Crude oil, quantity of Crude oil purchased, what is the demand: supply position of Petroleum products in India, how is the pricing done in the existing circumstances, and when there has been no appreciable increase in the petroleum prices in the international market, why are the Petroleum Companies in India are on a song, and hungry for more revenue? Now, how could the profit of Rs 3,682.82 Cr during the last first fiscal, turn into a loss, assuming that Government did not part with Rs 1,694.45 Cr as 50% of its share in the loss. This is only a notional adjustment in the balance sheet. Loss is a loss, whether it is subsidized by people or Government.
Dr B K Chaturvedi Committee went into the issue of usage of Kerosene oil in the Country. His findings have been documented. The study revealed that the use of kerosene has come down from 40% to 51% used earlier, only 1% is used for cooking purposes; out of 39% PDS Kerosene, 18% finds a way to the black market to adulterate diesel, 24% of rural consumption used for lighting is in villages where there is 100% electrification. Only 40% of the kerosene finds use. The rest is not used. Government’s subsidy for kerosene is Rs 17.92/a litre. What happens to the kerosene which is said to be distributed? The distribution is only in paper. Why can’t the Planning Commission do a detailed study to unearth the truth?
2] The truth is Petroleum companies’ profits are notched. They are virtual profits. How can any body say that factoring government subsidies, Companies make profit? These are monopoly Companies who are answerable to nobody.
3] During the year, the Government revised the petroleum prices at least on two occasions. Yet, why should there be a steep loss. Is it operational efficiency? Seepage? Misue?
4) How come such a vast change in refining? Has the government gone into the pricing of refining? In the first instance, they use the term cost of processing of Crude oil, and in the second case, they say gross refining margin. What does these two mean? Let the Economists of North bloc ponder over this aspect
5) The oil inventory showed it held excess stock. This stock had a price that was higher than the prevailing price as on 1 April 2010. The Oil Companies also admit that negatives on account of exchange losses due to Rupee depreciation and higher provisioning of bonds(the Government bonds that was given in lieu of 50% of the under recoveries). If they contend that these anomalies must be factored into the price of petroleum products, it is not fair and decent price determination.
.
Due to dollar depreciation, the invoice value of crude import should have come down, as the prices are paid in dollars. There is a comfortable cushion in this. In India, you are selling in Rupees. You don’t link the price to the Dollar. Hence twin advantage. Please use the same matrix for comparison.
The Company argues that the nett revenue lost by IOC was Rs 11,013.58 Cr. It was compensated Rs 3,671.26 Cr from upstream firms like Oil & Gas Corporation, GAIL and Oil India. Consequent to non revision of retail selling price in line with the international prices, net under realization was Rs 7,341.59 Cr. The usual practice was that the Government reimbursed Rs 20,000 Cr for under recoveries of IOC, BP, and HP during 2010-11.
The oil Companies agree that the net sales during 2010-11 went up by 23% to Rs 71,257 Cr. IOC alone had 17.254 million tones of petroleum products against 16.703 million tones duing the corresponding period (April-June 2009) while it exported 1.058 million Tonnes. The Refineries refined 13.278 million tones of Crude oil against 12.466 million tones a year ago during March-June of 2010 and 2009. The refineries are said to have clamped Rs 6.50 per litre as charges.
The oil Companies do not do any homework and incapable of working an alternate strategy. One aspect that Planning Commission should look into the capacity of motor cars being sold in India during a year, and whether the present infrastructure has capacity to withstand them. Secondly, if the demand for petroleum products could be brought down through planning, it will have a cascading effect on the supply and pricing. Merely to boost the manufacturing output, if uneven growth in manufacture of motor cars is made, the infrastructure would break down. It is good to draw a road map to build 7,000 km of highway Roads. But the wear and tear, its optimum capacity and longevity are factors that needed to be factored in. It can’t be utopian. Banks find it easy to provide vehicle loan as the motorcar is a tangible asset. But whatever incremental growth that is achieved should be practical and long withstanding otherwise, it will become Robinson Crusoe paradox situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment